Recruitment technology rarely fails because of missing features. It fails when product, process and commercial reality drift apart. I work on both sides of the market to fix that.
The tool gets bought. Usage stays patchy. Renewal arrives before anyone has measured the return.
Features get built for the demo, not the desk. What the product does and what agencies need slowly diverge.
Platforms that should talk to each other don't. Data fragments. Decisions get made on guesswork.
Vendors and agencies talk past each other. The person who understands how both sides think is rarely in the room.
The work spans both sides of the market: vendors building rectech and agencies using it. The perspective from each side is different, and that gap matters.
Building a product agencies want is harder than it looks from the outside. Rectech vendors get a direct line into how recruitment agencies think: how they evaluate tools, where new products fit into existing stacks, what competitor features are shaping buyer expectations right now, and where future product opportunities lie. That perspective feeds into product validation, roadmap input, future product ideation, and go-to-market strategy informed by real agency buying behaviour.
Most recruitment agencies have technology they are not getting enough from. The problem is rarely the tool: it is alignment. The work is to optimise the rectech stack, close the gaps between platforms, and build a technology foundation that holds up as the business grows. That means rectech implementation and optimisation, automation design, AI strategy, adoption programmes, and techstack futureproofing. Every engagement starts with how your agency generates revenue and works backwards from there.
Direct experience with the clients and platforms below, across innovation, sales operations, systems and data roles inside some of the UK's most recognised recruitment businesses.
One of the more opinionated voices in recruitment technology, with deep knowledge of the rectech product landscape: not just the category leaders, but the challengers, the niche tools, and the features reshaping what agencies expect from their vendors.
That breadth comes from real experience working inside global recruitment and rectech businesses, across teams in multiple time zones, including senior technology roles at agencies. That means asking questions vendors haven't been asked before, bringing new ideas into every conversation, and treating technology as a connected system. The work spans AI strategy, automation design, techstack alignment, and product consultancy for rectech vendors.

Working with Vealeocity is like having an extension of your product team who truly gets recruitment. James bridges the gap between agency workflows and feature design in a way that is grounded and impactful.

I have worked with James for 3+ years. He is a true Bullhorn Automation and AI expert, always ahead of the curve and focused on impact. If you want to get the most out of Bullhorn and deliver real value fast, James is your guy.
Ongoing support, a defined project, or targeted input when you need it. Each engagement model is built around clear outcomes.
Defined scope, clear deliverables and a fixed timeline. Built around a specific commercial outcome.
Ongoing strategic and delivery support. Best for product teams or agencies evolving quickly.
Targeted expertise without long-term commitment. For teams that need experienced input at a critical moment.
Describe what you're working on and we'll work out the right way to engage.